tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3955304210599373230.post456590029534092966..comments2024-03-28T17:50:40.478+00:00Comments on Fuse open science blog: The Pig ObservationFusehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02167289608282259405noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3955304210599373230.post-24800876811734221992013-06-03T15:57:08.603+01:002013-06-03T15:57:08.603+01:00Oooops, that's my credentials as a historian r...Oooops, that's my credentials as a historian ruined. Interesting that other people have made the same bogus argument, I've never heard it said. Poor old Darwin.Peter Tennanthttp://www.about.me/petertennantnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3955304210599373230.post-87597587925718703152013-05-30T17:11:10.518+01:002013-05-30T17:11:10.518+01:00Lot's to agree with here, but not the bogus ar...Lot's to agree with here, but not the bogus argument about Darwin. "There's no way Darwin would have been REFable." Heard people make it before. Darwin was very productive, he published loads while waiting to publish Origin. By the standards of his day he'd been very REFable. Christiaannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3955304210599373230.post-24234175901179564712013-05-30T10:55:20.968+01:002013-05-30T10:55:20.968+01:00Another great blog post Peter! What a well written...Another great blog post Peter! What a well written perspective on the REF, often when another standardized "bar" is raised we are all too keen to just try to jump it without asking the bigger questions (though I know rules are rules…) Thanks for sharing this and hope it can inspire some dialogue amongst the Ref-able-which is not me-but I am *sure* the experience is more sour than sweet ;) lady3emghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04528926292088999397noreply@blogger.com