Systematic reviews are brilliant. They take all the available evidence for a particular topic, do something special (stick the results into a big cauldron) and churn out a finding that informs us mere mortals in policy and practice where we should and shouldn’t be investing our money and capacity.
|Double, double toil and trouble...|
However, there is one sphere of public health where we feel that systematic reviews may not paint a full and fair picture.
Let us explain.
Most public health colleagues have a speciality or five. This might be a topic (e.g. nutrition or addiction) or part of the life-course (e.g. children and young people or older adults).
We are Workplace Health Specialists with 28 years of combined experience. We’ve supported employers of all descriptions, including businesses of different sizes and in different sectors. We’ve worked on national workplace health programmes, such as the Well@Work programme led by the British Heart Foundation between 2005 and 2007, and have been involved in the North East Better Health at Work Award since its launch in 2009 (arguably the biggest and most successful workplace health programme in England). We’ve a lot of experience of supporting NHS organisations who are trying to improve the health of staff – sometimes successfully, sometimes less so.
Working with such a variety of employers to improve staff health is a challenge of both knowledge and skill because they are looking to you, as the expert, to come up with evidence-based suggestions. Consider how you might support the below employers (real examples for us) to encourage physical activity in their workforce:
- A tea factory which operates 24 hours a day with mixed shifts and a predominantly female, part-time workforce
- A call centre for a bank employing 1,200 mostly young staff, in a mainly sedentary occupation
- A call centre for a public sector organisation employing workers typically aged 40 plus, in a mainly sedentary occupation
- A mining company at which the majority of the workforce arrive, take a lift down a shaft for 20 minutes, work a shift underground in 40 degree heat, resurface in the lift and get straight in the car to head home
- A category B prison.
|How would you support an employer to encourage physical activity in a call centre?|
We believe that these differences make workplace health a different kettle of fish compared to other settings, such as schools, colleges, universities, and prisons, which could be comparatively homogeneous. They aren’t of course – there are massive differences between schools for example, but our suggestion is that they have the potential to be very similar if all variable things (e.g. culture, policies etc.) were the same.
What’s our point?
Firstly, that lumping trials of workplace health interventions and programmes into a systematic review masks these potentially huge differences. We’re not sure how we get around this issue but we are raising it as an issue.
Secondly, to suggest that there is a lot more research to be done. There are some workplaces that should be considered a priority. For example, the majority of the working population in the private sector (60%) are employed by small-to-medium sized enterprises (less than 250 employees) and this is an area that no-one has cracked in terms of health and wellbeing via the workplace. Another example is call centres: given the sedentary, pressured nature of the work. One feasibility trial has recently been completed (Morris et al. 2019) and another is underway (involving Scott). We can’t do individual studies for every type of workplace but some should be considered a priority.
Thirdly, to highlight the skills possessed by our peers who lead on workplace health. Employers and employees can throw all sorts of issues at you from bread and [low fat] butter stuff like physical activity and mental wellbeing to stuff like menopause awareness and sleep. Not only does a workplace health specialist need to maintain a base knowledge of all these topics, but they also need to understand how it might be tackled in the various types of workplace highlighted above.
It would be remiss of us not to plug the North East Better Health at Work Award. It needs a stronger evaluation building on previous work (Braun et al. 2014), but we’re talking about a programme that was launched in 2009 and has actively engaged hundreds of employers every single year since (456 currently engaged at January 2020), supporting them to promote the health and wellbeing of their staff (potential combined reach of 202,962 working adults as of January 2020) and the wider community. We’re always recruiting more businesses so if you would like to know more visit www.betterhealthatworkne.org.
- Morris, A.S., Murphy, R.C., Shepherd, S.O., Healy, G.N., Edwardson, C.L. & Graves, L.E.F. (2019). A multi-component intervention to sit less and move more in a contact centre setting: a feasibility study. BMC Public Health, 19 (1), 292 https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-019-6615-6
- Braun, T., Bambra, C., Booth, M., Adetayo, K. & Milne, E. (2014). Better health at work? An evaluation of the effects and cost–benefits of a structured workplace health improvement programme in reducing sickness absence. Journal of Public Health, 37 (1), 138 –142 https://academic.oup.com/jpubhealth/article/37/1/138/1559494