We’ve come a long way since Becks Blue was your go-to if you were looking for an alcohol-free alternative to beer.
Supermarkets offer shelves full of zero alcohol gin, 0% craft beer, prosecco – and more. A non-alcoholic Cobra with your curry? No problem. Even Guinness now offers an alcohol-free version.
They’re all a great alternative if you want to reduce or stop drinking, especially if you still want to ‘feel’ like you’re having a drink.
But who is this helping?
Our latest research has found that you’re more likely to buy zero or low alcohol alternatives if you’re younger, you fall into a higher earning bracket and you’re well-educated.
And that’s probably unsurprising, given that non-alcoholic alternatives aren’t cheap - and can sometimes be more expensive than their ‘normal’ equivalents.
For example, at the time of writing, a UK supermarket was selling a litre of Gordon’s Gin (37.5% ABV) at £15.99 a litre, alongside the new 0.0% version at £20 a litre. So if you want to switch, you’re going to have to pay a bit more.
It’s a similar story when it comes to other health-related behaviours, such as eating good quality, fresh food or having a gym membership, where those who are more affluent will lead the way – possibly because they can simply afford to.
Which leads to further questions – are zero or low alcohol drinks only able to make a small difference when it comes to harmful levels of drinking across all groups, including those who are economically disadvantaged? And - does the price and accessibility of these alternatives create some inequality in itself?
Headline findings from our study – do low or no alcohol drinks increase health inequalities?
We wanted to find out whether the purchase and consumption of zero or low alcohol beers differs by demographic and socio-economic characteristics.
To do so, we looked at purchase data from almost 80,000 households and surveys from over 100,000 adults, provided by Kantar World Panel.
We found that zero alcohol beer was more likely to be bought and drunk by younger people and more socio-economically advantaged consumers.
We also saw higher purchase levels in those who generally bought and drank the most alcohol – and this was higher in men, younger adults, and those with higher incomes.
Households that were more likely to buy low alcohol beer were also heavier buyers of alcohol overall, and more likely to be middle-aged (45-64 years).
We also found that for every purchase of a low or no alcohol alternative, there were just under 46 purchases of the alcoholic equivalent – so buying and drinking levels of the low or no alcohol products are still relatively low.
Proportion (%) of households that reported at least one purchase of zero alcohol beer (green, left vertical axis), low alcohol beer (orange, left vertical axis) and all other beer (red, right vertical axis) for any day that a household made an alcohol purchase by study day, 2015 to 2020. Data points: daily.
What does this mean?
The increasing availability of low or no alcohol alternatives might be a useful tool to reduce overall drinking in the more socially advantaged groups in society, but not so beneficial for the rest of the population.
Zero or low alcohol alternatives are great if you can afford them, but they’re not the whole answer when it comes to addressing the real issues around drinking alcohol – including some of the deeper and wider reasons that drive people to drink so much in the first place, the ready availability of alcohol, and its relatively low price.
In conclusion, we believe that promoting zero and low alcohol alternatives is not enough to address the harm done by alcohol, including alcohol-related health inequalities.
Additional evidence-based policy measures - such as a Minimum Unit Price and improved funding for alcohol treatment and intervention and prevention services - are needed to lessen harms of alcohol which are experienced by the most disadvantaged people in our society.
References
This blog is based on a paper published in September 2021 in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health- ‘Is buying and drinking zero and low alcohol beer a higher socio-economic phenomenon? Analysis of British survey data, 2015-2018 and household purchase data 2015-2020.’ – by Peter Anderson, Amy O’Donnell, Dasa Kokole, Eva Jane Llopis, Eileen Kaner.
Professor Eileen Kaner, Professor Peter Anderson and Dr Amy O’Donnell are based at Newcastle University and members of the NIHR ARC North East and North Cumbria. This blog was produced by the NIHR ARC North East and North Cumbria on behalf of the report authors.
You can read the full paper, here.
Other linked research that may be useful for readers:
This blog is based on a paper published in September 2021 in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health- ‘Is buying and drinking zero and low alcohol beer a higher socio-economic phenomenon? Analysis of British survey data, 2015-2018 and household purchase data 2015-2020.’ – by Peter Anderson, Amy O’Donnell, Dasa Kokole, Eva Jane Llopis, Eileen Kaner.
Professor Eileen Kaner, Professor Peter Anderson and Dr Amy O’Donnell are based at Newcastle University and members of the NIHR ARC North East and North Cumbria. This blog was produced by the NIHR ARC North East and North Cumbria on behalf of the report authors.
You can read the full paper, here.
Other linked research that may be useful for readers:
- Impact of low and no alcohol beers on purchases of alcohol: interrupted time series analysis of British household shopping data, 2015–2018 – BMJ Open, October 2020
- Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care settings – Cochrane Review, 2018
- The relationship between alcohol-related hospital admission and specialist alcohol treatment provision across local authorities in England since passage of the Health and Social Care Act 2012 – Cambridge University Press, July 2020
