Showing posts with label blogging. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blogging. Show all posts

Friday, 19 December 2025

Spark ideas, inspire change and fuel innovation - sharing research creatively

Posted by Ella Anderson, Fuse Public Involvement and Engagement Manager, Newcastle University

Have you ever wondered how to share your research in a way that engages with new and diverse audiences? Are there ways to share your work in a way that reaches the people it was designed to serve? If the answer is yes, then read on!

Research can spark ideas, inspire change and fuel innovation but all too often it gets buried in academic journals and dense reports that few people read, particularly the communities the research intends to serve. So what if there were more engaging, creative and accessible ways to share your findings? From interactive infographics and animations, to events, theatre and podcasts, Fuse researchers are re-imagining how to communicate their work with wider audiences.

Whether you are looking to captivate the public, influence policy makers or engage fellow experts, this post explores some creative ideas to make your research truly resonate.
  • In the first instance, reach out to any people who you have worked with as part of your research including public partners, young people, charities and voluntary organisations. What would they like to see? Actively liaise with and listen to the communities your research is intending to serve - how do they want findings presented?
  • Infographics and visual summaries can be a useful way to transform your findings into a simplified visual. Infographics are a graphic representation of information, data or knowledge to present complex content quickly and clearly. Emma Adams has worked with More than Minutes to summarise research about co-located services in a visual and accessible way. Steph Scott worked with Nifty Fox - specialists in visual storytelling - to produce a flipbook drawing on content from the ‘Divided Households’ report relating to children and parental imprisonment. Fuse Deputy Director Amelia Lake, Shelia Visram and team co-produced the Hyper Energy drink leaflet with young people to communicate key findings. Or what about a zine (DIY-style booklet or magazine) like this, ‘Moving Spaces’, co-produced by Caroline Dodd-Reynolds with LGBTQIA+ young people, exploring how physical activity spaces could be more joyful and safe.
    • Theatre and performance is an exciting way of communicating research. For example, Cap-A-Pie and researchers including Mandy Cheetham were involved in developing an emotive theatre production called Credit, based on stories and experiences of people living on Universal Credit.
       
    • Creative and engaging community events and workshops (with catering if you have budget!) are always a popular option. The more interactive, accessible and collaborative the better. Use the opportunity to close any feedback loops with people, charities, organisations who you have engaged with throughout the research. Show how you listened, what you found out, how findings are applicable to people's lives and work, and what happens next... keeping people in the loop is so important. Be sure to include opportunities for plain language Q&As and conversations, both informal (through breaks) and formal (via panel discussions). At one of Fuse’s International Women’s Day events, there was an optional gong bath for people attending the event. Although a sound bath may not have been directly linked to the research, the event was about creating a welcoming, inclusive and ‘safe space’ for people to come together.
    • If you have the budget, consider having an event doodled in real-time. We have had colleagues who have worked with Camille Aubry, Josie Brookes and Nifty Fox who offer this skill. Get in touch with us if you would like any other recommendations when sourcing quotes.
    • Have you thought about gamification of research findings or using interactive digital tools? You can create interactive quizzes or clickable maps to allow people to explore findings in an engaging way, applying insights to local contexts. Simulation tools allow public partners and individuals to visualise the impact of different public health interventions based on research findings. Take a look at Joanne McGrath's online Maze, which provided an interactive resource portraying women’s narratives of multiple exclusion, homelessness and accessing support.
    • Storytelling has long been a way to share information. Case studies lend themselves well to this, as human-centric narratives show the research in action. It can demonstrate how a specific person or community has benefitted or will benefit from the findings. Stories are a different way to 'humanise' data or translate findings in a way that is appropriate for the intended audience. For example, Cassey Muir and Ruth McGovern’s co-produced Twinkle Twinkle Arti children’s story book communicated messages about parental substance use in a gentle, age-appropriate manner. The book is available as a physical copy, an electronic copy and also has been made into a CBeebies style story time video.
    • Are there any opportunities for the use of creative methods throughout the project that you could bring together as part of an exhibition in a public space e.g. library, community centre, schools? Documenting the research and experience through photography, crafts or art can be a creative way of capturing interest and making research more understandable. Sarah Martin-Denham’s crochet blanket made up of 2,999 squares representing the number of children excluded every day from schools in England (2021/22 academic year) is a great example of this, and has been on a national tour engaging with 24 organisations - including the Children’s Commissioner Office and multiple councils.
    • You can share bite-sized research or findings through social media channels using visuals, animations, short videos - or even livestreaming to provide information and engage with people in real-time. Have a hashtag at the ready to encourage people to join the conversation and share perspectives. In a similar vein, there are opportunities to share research and knowledge via 'Ask Me Anything' style forums, for example as seen on Reddit. Yes, this is low cost but it comes with risks as questions are unpredictable! However, it is worth flagging as an option and is a creative, ‘non-traditional’ way to share research and answer questions.
    • Blogs, like the award-winning one you are reading right now, are a great way to share your research. Posts can make complex information more accessible to a wider audience. It allows you to present findings in a clear, engaging and informal style, reaching readers outside of academic circles, including policy makers, practitioners and the wider public. For guidance and support in writing your own blog post, contact Fuse Communications Manager, Mark Welford: m.welford@tees.ac.uk.
    • Could you take your research findings to places in the local community? Fuse colleagues Balbir Singh (Artistic Director of the Balbir Singh Dance Company) and Paul Chazot displayed art works from their Unmasking Pain project in pop-up displays in GP surgeries and a repurposed shop in a shopping centre. There is now a dedicated space at the Grainger Market, Newcastle-upon-Tyne called the Being Well Place, which is a place to connect and engage with the local community.
    • Do you have the option of translating materials/outputs for different audiences, and communities with diverse language needs? Translated summaries and visuals e.g. in multiple languages, work well and ensure inclusivity in dissemination. For example, Nicola Heslehurst worked with local designer, Twentyseven Design to develop English and Welsh infographics relating to pregnancy outcomes.
    • And finally what kind of Fuse Public Involvement and Engagement Manager would I be if I wasn’t promoting the wonderful and award-winning public partner-led podcast Public Health Research and Me?! Accessible, informative, flexible and friendly - this is a great way to share quality research with a diverse and international audience. 

    There are many more creative ways to share research and remember - there is a no ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to sharing your findings. Always take into account your research topic, your findings and above all your target audience.

    Why not send us a message today if you have used a creative or innovative way to share your research or findings? We would love to hear from you and find out more ways to promote and share high quality research.




    Following strong interest from Fuse members, we have launched a Community of Practice (CoP) focused on creative research, involvement and dissemination.

    The first meeting will take place in the New Year. Places are limited for the first event but please register or get in touch (info@fuse.ac.uk), as there will be plenty more opportunities in future!

    A CoP is a network of people who share common interests and goals, creating a space for knowledge exchange, learning, and mutual support.

    Friday, 11 February 2022

    Now that's what I call blogging 2021

    Posted by Mark Welford, Fuse Communications Manager, Teesside University

    Let’s all channel British novelist E.M. Forster and play a little game of Only Connect. What connects the things below?


    “Yes of course, they can all be a type of list” (said in the friendly yet ever so slightly patronising manner of host Victoria Coren Mitchell)
    I think it's fair to say that we all love a list. I mean, the premise of another very popular BBC gameshow is basically to list pointless stuff.

    So here again (a little later than advertised) is our annual list of the most-viewed Fuse blog posts of 2021!

    You'd be forgiven for thinking that this would be dominated by Covid and the pandemic as we saw in the 2020 list.

    Obviously, we had our fair share of pandemic related posts. Blogs about misinformation, food insecurity, malnutrition, obesity and what children made of it all. How it impacted on work and engagement with public partners, parents, decisionmakers, practitioners, policy-makers and commissioners. How it affected our mental healthour liberties and even inspired a song and a cat-scale of wellbeing!

    But as you can see from the list below it didn't dominate the top 5 chart-toppers of 2021. Perhaps a little escapism goes along way...

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Katsushika Hokusai: The Great Wave off Kanagawa
    5. The other third wave: a mass epidemic of very individual pain

    Posted by Jack Nicholls, Lecturer in Social Work at Northumbria University

    Lockdown restrictions were beginning to ease in the UK. But after the jubilation, what if you don't feel the way you think you should?

    A very personal post by Jack Nicholls on the long-term mental health consequences of the pandemic, of lockdown and social restrictions, and of its easing. 

    *Content/trigger warning: mental health, depression, suicidal feelings.

    Page views: 938
    Published: 16 April 2021.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. Patient and Public involvement with Parents during a Pandemic: the four ‘P’ challenge


    Posted by Hannah Batten, Food and Human Nutrition undergraduate student at Newcastle University. Hannah was on a placement year with the Population Health Sciences Institute, as part of the MapMe study aiming to help parents assess child weight.
    Body image scales on the MapMe website are being updated for MapMe2
    "Most importantly, is to say to our participants that we are extremely grateful for their time and input, particularly during these uncertain times."
    Hannah tells us how she and the MapMe study team met the challenges involved in recruiting and running an online Parent Involvement Panel (PIP) to help review documents and study materials, when parents were already dealing with a global pandemic. 

    Page views: 1,029
    Published: 5 March 2021.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    3. Should pregnancy 'be incentive enough' to quit smoking?

    Posted by Susan Jones, Research Associate at Teesside University

    In this blog post on #NoSmokingDay, Dr Jones explored deprivation, guilt, shame, stigma and the complex web of reasons behind smoking behaviour.

    Page views: 1,155
    Published: 10 March 2021.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    2. Things I wish I’d known when I started my PhD… (part 1)

    Posted by members of the Population Health Interventions Programme at the MRC Epidemiology Unit


    Research doesn't happen overnight, avoid comparison and channel your inner Arsène Wenger ("Le Professeur"). In our second most popular blog post, the early, mid and senior career researchers at University of Cambridge share their tips for PhD survival.

    Here is part 2 which interestingly received only half as many views despite including a High School Musical reference.



    Page views: 1,347
    Published: 4 June 2021.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. Can Forest School inspire the next generation to be happy & healthy?

    Posted by Katie Beresford, undergraduate student at Durham University

    With more than 2,700 views this is our most read post of 2021 by some distance!

    In it Katie explores growing up in the Lake District, embracing nature, finding school restrictive and struggling academically in her early years.

    Nearly two decades later she is completing a Fuse summer internship with the NIHR School for Public Health Research and is tasked to review literature discussing the effectiveness of Forest School as a public health intervention.

    Why not grab a coffee and take a walk with Katie into the woods to find out what she discovered...

    Page views: 2,746
    Published: 8 October 2021.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    So there you have it, the top five Fuse blog posts of 2021. Congratulations to Katie who wins a rare and coveted Fuse paperweight!  

    Fantastically both Katie and Hannah's blog posts were part of our Fuse blog Student Series which we launched last year! This showcases posts by students who have been challenged to write a blog as part of their studies. The authors may be new to blogging and we hope to provide a 'safe space' for the students to explore their subject and find their voice in the world of public health research. Hopefully this will encourage other students to take the plunge!

    As always, many thanks to our loyal readers and fantastic contributors.

    Can we do any better in 2022? If you fancy giving it a go, please find out what we are looking for and how to take part here. All contributors receive a much sought-after Fuse badge.



    Images:
    2. Image: Katsushika Hokusai, (CC0 1.0), via Wikimedia Commons
    4. Mr. Alexander Ottesen, CC BY-SA 2.5, via Wikimedia Commons

    Friday, 8 January 2021

    Now that's what I call blogging 2020: the Covid edition

    Posted by Mark Welford, Fuse Communications Officer, Teesside University

    It was business as usual for the Fuse blog in January 2020.  PhD student Kelly Rose told us about having sleepless nights thinking about school food and teenage diets; Coral Hanson and her co-authors channelled their inner Mr Motivator to consider whether exercise referral was fit for a new decade; and Angela Wearn asked if reaching the ‘hard-to-reach’ meant leaving traditional academia at the door?

    So far so good… and then the ‘C’ word arrived and the world changed and with it the Fuse blog in the form of John Mooney’s frighteningly prescient post on the 5 February - Coronavirus: expect the unexpected in an unfolding emergency.

    Last year we published posts about workplace health, tackling obesity through planning policy, the impact of commercial actors on health, food shaming, mental health, the emotional road to impact, Universal Credit, facing a Parliamentary Select Committee, inequalities, family carers of people living with dementia, International Men’s Day (yes, there is one!), and kicking Coca-Cola out of Christmas.

    Our authors asked: 

    • Can your education, income or even your job affect your chances of receiving newer cancer treatments? 
    • Why is it so difficult to change our health habits? 
    • Does antibiotic prescribing penalise communities in most need? 
    • Would easy-read documents for all mean a more inclusive healthcare system? and;
    • What is the recipe for a happy retirement?

    But it will come as no surprise that the 2020 chart of the top five most-read Fuse blog posts is dominated by one topic: Coronavirus, Covid-19 or just plain COVID.

    Here are our chart-toppers of 2020:


    5. Experts by Experience challenge us to create opportunities for them to take the lead in research

    First up is our only non-Covid related entry in which Angela Broadbridge and Ged Hazlehurst from the Fulfilling Lives Newcastle Gateshead project write about co-producing research with people with lived experience of multiple and complex needs.

    Page views: 1727.  Posted: 15 May 2020


    4. COVID-19 has brought the “digital divide” to the fore

    Gemma Wilson from Northumbria University explores how a lack of access to technology and wider support networks during the pandemic is significantly heightening inequalities.

    Page views: 1839.  Posted: 29 May 2020

     

    3. Coronavirus: expect the unexpected in an unfolding emergency

    Up next is the aforementioned post by John Mooney, Locum Consultant in Public Health at NHS Highland and one-time specialist in the epidemiology of respiratory infectious diseases. Published days after the first confirmed UK cases, John's blog was prophetic in highlighting the potential for symptomless transmission, virus instability and divergent strains.

    Page views: 1909.  Posted: 5 Feb 2020

     

    2. This crisis has shown how many people were only just about managing

    Our runner-up is Mandy Cheetham from Northumbria University writing about her experience with a community hub delivering food parcels, prescriptions and supporting vulnerable people during the pandemic.

    Page views: 2019.  Posted: 9 May 2020

     

    1. Working from home isn’t for everyone - here’s how to cope if you’re struggling

    "Being isolated at home can be hard; it is easy to feel cut off from friends and co-workers, to feel out of the loop when it comes to work decisions and to feel stressed with how best to work when at home."  

    During the first national lockdowns imposed by the UK governments, Annabel van Griethuysen from Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, shared her tips on working from home. These include keeping a routine, eating and drinking well, having a completely separate space to work (if possible) which is tidied or hidden away at the end of the day, staying connected and reaching out to talk to your social circles if you feel anxious and stressed.

    At a time when many people are again being asked to work from home it is apt that Annabel's post should take the crown as most popular blog in 2020.

    Page views: 2106.  Posted: 9 April 2020


    So there you have it, the top five Fuse blog posts from 2020.  All five received more page views than last year's number one, which is thanks to our loyal readers and fantastic contributors - thank you!  

    Can we do any better in 2021?  If you fancy giving it a go, please find out what we are looking for and how to take part here.  All contributors receive a much sought-after Fuse badge, and the writer of the most read post wins a rare and coveted Fuse paperweight.*

    Happy New Year!


    *when we are allowed back in the office!


    Images:

    1. "Now That's What I Call Music! 1991" by Brett Jordan is licensed under CC BY 2.0
    2. Courtesy of Fulfilling Lives Newcastle Gateshead: http://www.fulfillinglives-ng.org.uk

    All page views correct at the time of writing.

    Friday, 10 January 2020

    Now that's what I call blogging 2019

    Posted by Mark Welford, Fuse Communications Officer, Teesside University

    Happy New Year – can I still say that or have we reached peak-greet when this obligatory salutation is no longer required in email, phone, or awkward fleeting corridor exchange?

    This time of year is all about numbers: the 12 days of Christmas, the pounds you’ve gained (lbs) or lost (£), counting steps, units, the 31 days of Dry January, Veganuary, or the point at which you can grant yourself a run free day.

    It therefore seems fitting that the Fuse blog has a countdown of its own.  Last year was a fine vintage for blog posts but you may not have had the opportunity to read all 40 of them.  To save you time we have had a look back and created a Top 5 Chart of the ‘bestsellers’.

    So without further ado, here’s our chart toppers:

    5. The provocatively titled Can cancer ever be a good thing? in which Fiona Menger (@slt_fi) revisits the writing of 'cancer columnist' John Diamond while working on a head-and-neck cancer research study with a focus on a phenomenon called post-traumatic growth.

    Page views: 585.  Posted: 31 May 2019 

    4. In What old crisp packets dig up Duika Burges Watson (@debedub) gets hands on to unpack the mystery of the humble crisp.  What is their continued value as ‘food’ and can we still enjoy them as a cultural icon without creating so much waste and damaging our health?

    Page views: 640.  Posted: 22 February 2019

    Still from the animation
    3. Why do some women continue to smoke when they are pregnant?  Sue Jones (@Susan_E_Jones) shares research findings on overcoming barriers to implementing NICE guidance on supporting pregnant women to quit smoking.  The blog includes a short animation which was developed based on the findings.

    Page views: 663.  Posted: 10 May 2019

    2. If at first you don’t succeed, try, try, try & try again...  Suzanne Moffatt (@SuzanneMoffatt) reflects on 58 months of knock backs in her efforts to secure ‘the big grant’ because multiple failures before success is often untold and sometimes persistence pays off.

    Page views: 686.  Posted: 15 February 2019

    Courtesy of Children's Future Food Inquiry via twitter
    1. "It’s time to act!  It’s time this country gave every child the right to food!"  Pamela Graham (@PamLGraham) begins her blog post with this powerful statement from Corey (pictured right), a 15-year-old Young Food Ambassador who sat on a stage in Westminster and bravely told an audience about her experiences of food insecurity.  With more than double the views of its nearest competitor, Young people taking a stand for their #Right2Food takes the crown as most popular blog post in 2019.

    Page views: 1474.  Posted: 03 May 2019

    So there you have it, the top five Fuse blog posts from 2019. Can we can do any better in 2020? If you fancy giving it a go, please find out what we are looking for and how to take part here.


    P.s. perhaps we need to look more closely at what's going on in February and May!?


    Image:
    1.  'Now That's What I Call Music! 1989' by brett jordan via Flickr. Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0): https://www.flickr.com/photos/x1brett/45056607035/

    Friday, 20 December 2019

    Happy New Year from everyone at Fuse

    We would like to wish all our readers and contributors a very Happy New Year - why not make a resolution to blog in 2020 and send us your posts?





    Image (adapted with thanks):
    The original uploader was Rsabbatini at English Wikipedia. [CC BY 4.0], via Wikimedia Commons.

    Thursday, 1 August 2019

    School's out for summer

    The blog will be back, refreshed and raring to go, on Friday 6th September 2019.

    To be the first to hear about new posts in the autumn, follow @fuse_online.


    Just because the blog is on holiday, doesn't mean you should be too. We always need your posts.

    Please continue to send your 600-800 word posts to m.welford@tees.ac.uk and they will be published just as soon as the blog is back in the office.

    Here's how to take part and why you should blog.


    Image: Ross Halfin [CC BY 3.0], via Wikimedia Commons

    Friday, 10 August 2018

    Blogiday

    The blog is on holiday over August but we still need your 500-700 word blog posts so that we can start September in style.

    Please email them to Mark Welford (m.welford@tees.ac.uk).

    Here's how to take part and why you should blog.




    Image: "'Gone fishing'" by Stephen McCowage via Flickr.com, copyright © 2015: https://www.flickr.com/photos/130768092@N05/16139476647

    Friday, 16 June 2017

    400 not out

    Posted by Mark Welford, Fuse Communications Officer, Teesside University

    This is the 400th post on the Fuse blog and in the spirit of using arbitrary milestones as worthy of note, I thought it was time for some (blog) post-match analysis.

    Brian Lara who holds the record for the highest individual score in a Test innings
     after scoring 400 not out against England playing for the West Indies in 2004.

    Over the last five-and-half-years, we have had 399 posts, written by 116 authors, and more than 395,000 page views. There has also been a lot of #fuseblog twittering, coffee room chats, and (you surely didn’t think it could be any other way?) blog-related committee discussions.

    We even won a UK blog award last year (not that we mention it much!) and were shortlisted in two award categories earlier this year. But shortlisted isn’t winning and on the train back from those awards in April, I contemplated what we could do to improve the blog or - dare I say it - if the blog had run its course, done its job, had its time.

    In academia, more than any sector that I’ve worked in (and I’ve worked in a few) you are encouraged to STOP, put down your machete, and climb above the canopy to see if the direction that you’re heading in is getting you to where you want to go. Academics will quite happily interrupt you in mid-flow to ask: ‘so what?’, ‘what impact are we making?’, ‘who are we reaching?’.

    Since taking the wheel from blog founder Jean Adams I have enjoyed myself. I have learnt a bit about community and herding cats, I have made some real-life and virtual friends. I have written the odd post, although admittedly not as many as Jean, and I have enjoyed the discipline of having to write 500 -700 words for public consumption (usually when I can’t find anyone else to post).

    I think the other writers have enjoyed it too, once they’d got past their initial reservations.

    From all of this, I surmise that people value both reading and contributing to the blog. But I don’t have a clear view of who you are. You also seem to be discussing it in some forums. But you aren’t leaving comments on the blog itself. We have had a grand total of 480 comments posted, of which 234 were spam. So that’s 246 sensible comments. From 395,000 views.

    So, I would now like to invite you to use the comment box below to post your thoughts on the blog so far. What sort of things do you like? What stuff would you rather we skipped? What would you like more of? Who are you? You don’t need to tell everyone your name, but what got you here? Why are you interested in this blog? What would make you more interested?

    It isn’t that tricky:
    1. Depending on how you got to this page, you either start typing straight in the white box, or you need to click the orange link “No comments” at the bottom of the post to get the white box to appear.
    2. After writing your thoughts, click on the “Comment as” pull-down. If you know what any of the branded options mean, select one. If not, just chose “Name/URL” or “Anonymous”. Then do the ‘prove you’re not a robot’ thing and you’re done.
    I’ll get an email. If you’re not flogging Viagra or using a barrage of abuse, I’ll approve your comment and you’ll be published.

    And, just before you get to work: thanks. Thanks to the writers, the readers, the reviewers, the commenters, the retweeters, and the lurkers. See you all again at the next arbitrary milestone.

    Thursday, 8 December 2016

    The one where we ask you to vote...

    Posted by Mark Welford, Fuse Communications Officer, Teesside University

    This post is a little like those episodes of Friends in which one of the cast says: “Do you remember the time when [cue wobbly vertical lines]…” and the rest of the 22-23mins is made up of clips from previous shows.

    Courtesy of photobucket.com/user/xuyu79/media/blog/s7/s07e18 / Warner Bros.
    Let me take you back to a post on Thursday 7 January in which we made a shameless plea to ask for your votes in the UK Blog Awards 2016.  In that post we told you how the blog’s 334 posts had received just over 167,000 views.  Eleven months on and 40 additional blog posts later, the page views have risen to nearly 325,000 - a fantastic achievement I hope you’ll agree!  I discovered this when an ambitious academic asked me if I could provide them with some killer stats about the blog to support their bid for a promotion. The power this blog wields!

    This year we have had posts covering everything from Dry January, the ‘nanny state’, animation, Jamie Oliver's school dinner and sugar tax campaigns, to ‘fat shaming’, indigenous Australians, Baywatch, energy drinks, Grandmothers, e-cigarettes, and 'legal highs'.

    Five years on from the blog's inception and we have reached the point where people are actively approaching us and generously giving up their time to write posts, rather than having to send in our crack team (the fear inducing) ‘blog working group’ to chase, harry and cajole*.  Could this - and the increased viewing figures - have something to do with the little matter of winning a UK Blog Award last year?  I'd like to think so.

    And now, we come to the crux of this post.  It is you, our dear readers and contributors that make the blog a success and it is thanks to you that we won a national award.  So we've decided to go for it again in the UK Blog Awards 2017!

    Here comes the shameless plug

    The blog has again been entered into two categories: 'Health and Social Care', and 'Education'.  You can vote for us in either category but of course we would really appreciate it if you voted for us in both.

    Vote now by following this link

    The above link takes you to our profile page on the UK Blog Awards website in which we have chosen two of our favourite posts from 2016:
    Voting closes at 10am on Monday 19 December.  One vote per email address.

    Hopefully it won't be a maple syrup bottle we'll be holding aloft in celebration come April 2017!

    Thank you for your support.

    *We do still need your posts!  Please contact me (m.welford@tees.ac.uk) if you would like to write a post for the Fuse blog. Here’s how to take part.

    Thursday, 5 May 2016

    You are now reading the award winning Fuse blog

    Posted by Mark Welford and Emma DoréeFuse Communications team, Teesside University

    You may recall that in January we used this platform to make a shameless plea inviting readers to vote for the Fuse blog in the UK Blog Awards and a month later you may have heard the news that we had been shortlisted in the categories of Education, and Health and Social Care.

    Well… (drum roll) …. We only went and won!  That’s right, you are now reading an award winning blog – fancy contributing?!


    Last Friday (29 April), we took the Fuse blog monster on a road trip to the big smoke, that there London, where the streets are paved with, well… paving stones to attend the awards ceremony, in eager anticipation.

    The awards ceremony was held at the swanky Park Plaza Hotel in Westminster, London and it is safe to say that it more than exceeded our expectations.  The invitation advised that we ‘dress to impress’ but some of the attire on show would have made Lady Gaga and James Bond feel underdressed.

    We were welcomed to the event, themed on Roald Dahl’s The BFG with free drinks and canapes (not to mention all the frogsquinkers, buzzwangles, and bugwhiffles we could handle), while we networked with other bloggers and even the Big Friendly Giant himself. The most exciting part however was still to come: the awards ceremony itself.

    Tech Reporter Kate Russell (you might know her from BBC show Click) hosted the evening and provided a great commentary, making every blogger there feel very welcome.  Her quirky comments worked to relax the atmosphere and ease frayed nerves.

    Each category had two blogs that were highly commended by the judges, followed by an overall winner.  As the Education category came up on screen, we watched in anticipation - the Fuse Blog wasn't announced as Highly Commended - oh well there was still the other category - but then to our surprise as the overall winner of the category!

    Having let out a little scream of excitement (and possibly the odd expletive), we went up onto the stage to collect our trophy – a rather lethal looking glass affair - and have our photograph taken with Kate and the judges. It was a surreal moment and very much unexpected with a dash of relief as there were no speeches.

    Obligatory award selfie
    Once the presentations were over, we were invited to have our photograph taken with the other winners. After which it was time to celebrate properly with more free prosecco (consumed in moderation), posh food and of course a little bit of disco dancing.

    This was a great event to be a part of and the venue made it feel even more special and exciting. As the night drew to a close and we collected our certificate and goody bags (with complementary BFG themed dream jars), the fact that we had actually come away as winners had not yet sunk in - it still hasn't now to be honest!

    Dream jars - also good for storing ginger biscuits
      
     This is a fantastic achievement for Fuse, as more than two thousands blogs were submitted. There were more than seventy eight thousand votes in total and it is great to think that the Fuse Blog has such a loyal following and a lot of support.

    A special thank you must go to Jean Adams who founded the blog in 2011 and to everyone who has contributed over the years.  The posts have sparked great discussion and helped our readers learn what it is really like to work in public health.  Our many writers make the Fuse blog what it is.

    We really hope that you will continue to enjoy reading our posts and don’t forget, if you would like to contribute to the Fuse Blog then please do not hesitate to get in touch.

    If you would like to discuss a potential blog post or have something already written then please get in touch with Emma Dorée (E.Doree@tees.ac.uk).

    Thursday, 7 January 2016

    The blog monster returns with a shameless plug

    Posted by Emma Dorée, Fuse Communications Assistant

    Just over a year ago, we wrote about how far the blog had come since it hatched and it’s safe to say that the waistline of the - now fully grown - ravenous blog monster continues to expand.

    Feed me, Seymour!
    Since its creation in May 2010, the Fuse blog has had just over 167,000 views and we’ve posted 334 blogs – a great achievement, right?!

    As a result, we wanted to do something to celebrate this success and to see if we could reward all the contributors that make the Fuse blog what it is, so we have entered the UK Blog Awards 2016!

    The blog has been entered into two categories: 'Health and Social Care', and 'Education'. You can vote for us in either category but of course we would really appreciate it if you voted for us in both.

    You can vote for the Fuse blog once a day by following this link. We will be encouraging people to do this via our social media feeds but it would be even better if you could spread the word and encourage your friends and family to vote for us too.
    
    http://www.blogawardsuk.co.uk/ukba2016/my-entry/fuse-open-science-blog
    Click here to vote for the Fuse blog now

    Most importantly however, we still need people to continue sending us blog posts so if you work in public health then please get in touch.

    We want to hear about your aims, priorities and challenges or which issues you think need to be brought in to the public eye and debated. Could you give an insight into your role within public health for those not directly involved? Or is there a public health campaign in your area that you wish to promote or a topical news issue or event happening which could coincide with your post?

    We post blogs at least once a week and publicise them via our Facebook page and Twitter account. The blog has its own website but of course, you can also view the blogs by visiting the Fuse website.

    Email your posts to me (E.Doree@tees.ac.uk) and please let us know if you think there is anything we can do to improve the blog.

    Thank you to everyone who has contributed to the blog so far. You have sparked great discussion and helped our readers learn what it is really like to work in public health, no matter what your role is.

    The UK Blog Awards 2016 competition closes at 9pm on the 25 January so don’t forget to keep voting for us as much as possible until then!

    Photograph ‘into the mouth’ by Len "Doc" Radin via Flickr.com © 2005: https://www.flickr.com/photos/drurydrama/1079598181

    Thursday, 28 May 2015

    52 weeks in public health research – the (very) rough guide

    Guest post by Avril Rhodes

    Remember the natty idea to take photographs representing a year of working in public health research? Well, how about a quick analysis of what we saw, snapped and submitted? Here are the exciting and indeed revealing results.

    After looking at 198, or was it 200, images a portrait of researchers concerns emerges – not exactly Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, so much as the Rhodes' hierarchy of academic obsessions.


    Bottom or is it top of the pile comes food. It’s official – no less than 42 pictures, close up and distance shots, ranging from individual snacks, drinks and meals to full size conference spreads and displays. I felt slightly queasy after looking at them all. Feed those academics!


    The next most important thing is to feed the mind. Any passing course, lecture, symposium and the like weighing in with 20 pictures. But there’s lots more that get close to the mind-feeding category although making more cameo-esque appearances, such as degree ceremonies, IT, stands and posters, books, theses, work in progress and journal covers. Publication definitely counts. Completing work even more.


    The office – no not the TV series, comes next, with 16 images, inflated perhaps with opportunities created by moving office and the delights of standing desks and desks tied to exercise apparatus. I would not have dreamed that taking a picture of the immediate work environment was so important. 


    Travel ranks highly but possible to count in different ways. Railway stations are significant at 11 pictures, especially Newcastle Central – of world significance as stations go, but that’s just me. Car travel featured just slightly with a nod to cycling. Active travel (good and bad) is clearly a source both of delight, when stairs get favoured, and frustration, when lifts are promoted. Exercise equipment got a decent look in too. 


    Signs and marketing really played on the collective academic mind. Labelling, the impact of shop placements and advertising, spelling mistakes, unintended humour, public health messaging, came in with around 12 images. Some of this felt a bit judgemental, when it came to cheap unhealthy food signs. Not too many wider determinants of health, it has to be said.
     

    Field work related images scored a fairly respectable 9.
     

    Culture kept creeping in. Museum visits, architecture, music, sculpture were all there. Nature played a relatively small part, but researchers did appreciate the cute, the beautiful, office plants and the changing seasons.
     

    Then a whole rag bag of one-offs. Some were clearly novelty items or personal reminiscences, and some seemed like stream of consciousness, or pet concerns.


    Curiously, the academic world was quite short of pictures of people, except in crowd shots doing serious lecture type stuff. It looked a camera shy world. So what do we have? A hard working, semi-office bound, nomadic community that likes writing, learning, unable to switch off form public health even when undertaking a leisure activity or just walking around the town, that enjoys high art and longs to sniff a flower. Is this what we are? The camera apparently doesn’t lie.

    Thursday, 12 March 2015

    Who’s opting out of responsibility? Battle of the checkouts

    Posted by Mel Wakeman

    Let's make Britain healthier. Please remove all junk from all tills and make EVERY store take responsibility

    This was the message that was shared by all the supporters of our Thunderclap campaign on Monday 9th March. The Children’s Food Trust, British Dental Association, British Dietetic Association, Action on Sugar and Faculty for Public Health signed up alongside more than 100 other advocates asking stores to get rid of the junk food they display and promote at their checkouts. Our social reach exceeded 94,500 which is hugely encouraging and supports the idea that much of the public would welcome and benefit from such a move.

    Courtesy of dailymail.co.uk
    I am not ignoring the fact that when it comes to the power of pestering from children, parents have a responsibility to set boundaries and deal with whining requests for sweets and treats. I also appreciate that the public are entitled to choice but my point is that if we want to make healthier choices, they should be the easiest of choices. Why not promote fresh fruit and low fat, salt and sugar options at the tills? In my mind if you want to buy junk, then walk to the dedicated aisle; that is your decision and your responsibility. We have been advised to reduce our sugar intake (the WHO released new guidelines last week) and many will need support to do this; we must have an enabling environment that promotes positive health behaviour change rather than be constantly tempted and encouraged to pick up sugar rich and energy dense foods.

    In our first blog we named and shamed the leading stores that have yet to step up to the plate: Marks and Spencer, Morrisons, Asda, Sainsbury's Local, Iceland Foods and WHSmith. I have since written to all these stores asking them to adopt a blanket policy to remove all junk from all their tills. In each letter I stated that not doing this undermined any company values and intentions to be responsible for the products they sell. They are essentially sending out mixed messages concerning their company priorities (i.e. profits vs health) and most importantly they are undermining customer efforts to make healthier choices. I mentioned that evidence now suggests we are more likely to choose unhealthy products when impulse buying and that highly processed foods may be linked to addictive eating. These factors all exacerbate the negative impact junk food has on our health.

    The fact that Tesco, Lidl and Aldi have most recently committed to junk free checkouts is evidence enough that it can be done. Implying healthier checkouts can't be done and that customers don’t want them says these stores haven't tried hard enough! Many may want to have their cake and eat it but this is really not the way forward to better health. Tesco for example only display food items that contribute one of our five a day, have no ‘red’ traffic light ratings, and are deemed by the Department of Health to be a ‘healthier snack’. This approach makes a lot of sense to me, they still offer choice so what’s the problem?!

    So let’s go store by store and examine what I learnt about their company values and marketing policies. I checked out what they are currently doing in terms of in-store health initiatives and questioned why they did not acknowledge their role in supporting customers in making healthier choices.


    1. My first letter went to the CEO of Marks and Spencer.

    I commended their 22 pledges on the Government’s responsibility deal; they provide calorie controlled options as part of their ‘Calorie Reduction Plan’ and they have developed a ‘Well-being Week’ and ‘Veg Pledge’ but they could do so much more as part of their ‘Plan A’ initiative to promote healthy living.

    Their initial response to my letter was read with some amusement. It contained this statement:

    “From May 2012 we removed all sweets that might appeal (to children) from our belted till points. Belted tills are the most common type of tills we use in our food sections and are where we believe customers are most likely to be distracted by their display.”

    My reply went like this:

    With all due respect, how can you determine which sweets might and might not appeal to children at your belted till points? The colourful, character sweets may certainly appeal to younger children (and adults!) but how can you assume that in the absence of these, children will not go for the next best thing? You are also assuming that parents and families tend only to use the belted till points? Children are certainly not just the vulnerable party here either; as stated in our letter, health problems attributed to diet significantly affect both adults and children.

    With the continued roll out of your self-serve checkouts, surely it would be wise to review your current policy on all sweets at all till points. A blanket policy certainly sends out a much stronger message concerning your health agenda. The range and quantity of sweets on display at the self-service points are often vast and as we said previously, the accumulative impact of impulse buys (of high calorie foods) can be extremely detrimental. Our suggestion is simply to swap these items that are of low nutritional value with those that are healthier and more nutritious.

    Their reply came back as follows:

    M&S have “made a note of and will pass on my comments about having more healthier and more nutritious items to their Service and Policy team for their consideration.” Of course they “can’t confirm that any changes will be made” and following my request, would not provide a contact name for the person that leads this team (so that I could continue discussions). It was interesting to read that M&S are so “focused on engaging with millions of customers” yet they were very reluctant to commit to or continue conversations with me.

    2. My second letter went to Sainsbury’s

    Sainsbury Company Values acknowledge they have a key role to play in promoting healthy eating and (apparently) set out to make healthy choices easy for their customers. They state they are encouraging good health and helping people change their behaviour. Their 2014 marketing code of practice is very explicit regarding the protection of children; that they will aim to support the role of parents, uphold responsible consumption and nutrition. This all sounds great as they implement these values and policies in their large supermarkets but they fail to do so in their smaller, local stores. My request was to continue to roll out their Company Values and codes of practice to ALL Sainsbury’s stores.

    I have yet to receive a proper response other than being allocated a case manager with assurances that a full investigation will be conducted on behalf of the CEO. This was over a week ago....

    3. My third letter went to Asda

    Asda have reformulated products and cut the costs of healthier produce but other than that I found it very difficult to find any mention of specific healthy marketing policies. They have 22 pledges on the Government responsibility deal but the majority are related purely to alcohol. They have pledged to lower salt and saturated fat but, in my experience, on entering an Asda store you often hit a wall of doughnuts, muffins and biscuits before you get to the fruit and veg sections.

    The response I received from Asda was the most positive and promising:

    Their new Vice President of customer relations responded on behalf of their CEO. She indicated that following some recent changes to their structure, she was taking on Asda’s health agenda. She said she appreciated some of the significant issues that we face as a nation, and is keen to quickly determine how they as a business can help. She explained how she was currently recruiting a team to help first define their role in people’s lives from a health perspective (their customers, colleagues and communities they serve) and then prioritise the areas where they can make most material impact. To that end, she assured that her new Senior Director, once appointed, would contact me to discuss this subject further. I was quite happy with this and will certainly look at following this up.

    4. Next was WHSmith

    As a leading non-food retailer, I reminded WHSmith that they still have a key role to play in promoting healthy eating and enabling their customers to make healthier choices from the food that they offer. In their Corporate Responsibility document they acknowledge WHSmith “take the responsibility for the products we sell seriously”. Their Marketing Code of Practice states WHSmith “aim to offer customer’s choice but it is also essential that we accept and act responsibly concerning the food and drink products we offer”. The volume and variety of junk food displayed next to their tills is vast. WHSmith also use a particularly strong upselling strategy which further encourages the purchase and consumption of junk food. Buy a book or magazine and be asked to buy a massive bar of chocolate is entirely irresponsible.

    I read with interest that WHSmith “always take into account the level of knowledge, sophistication and maturity of the people we are marketing to, particularly children”. In light of this statement, I thought they would be interested to know that research suggests our nutrition knowledge is not sophisticated and adults often make food choices based on taste preferences without considering the health ‘value’. Adults often act impulsively too so it is a very large assumption that we can expect children to make sophisticated informed choices when it comes to food!

    Coincidentally a paper was published in the journal Public Health Nutrition around the time that I wrote to WHSmith and reported that almost one-sixth of non-food stores displayed checkout food and the majority of this was ‘less healthy’ and displayed at child height. Less healthy food was also more likely to be subject to a written price promotion than healthier food. Surely this has to change?

    I have had no response from WHSmith.*

    5. Next was Morrisons

    Their corporate responsibility review clearly outlines the commitments they have made and it is reassuring to see continuation of the 27 pledges made as part of the Governments’ responsibility deal. They have reformulated products and are promoting healthier options, fruit and vegetables but as yet there are no signs that they plan to remove the junk. When questioned on this matter via Twitter they reported that they were responding to customer demand for choice.

    I was intrigued by this and asked them if they had completed any customer surveys. Tesco and Lidl for example reported that over two-thirds of their customers prefer healthy checkouts and that adopting junk free tills had received overwhelmingly positive responses.

    I have had no response from Morrisons

    6. Last but not least was Iceland Foods

    Iceland’s corporate responsibility document outlines the commitments that they have made as far back as the 1980s. They have 10 pledges on the Government’s responsibility deal. Like Asda, they have reformulated products and are actively promoting fruit and vegetables. Again, they seem reluctant to take responsibility for the products they promote.

    I have had no response from Iceland Foods.

    If we are to see improvements in the levels of overweight and obesity in the UK, we must change our social and food environment. Without doubt they (amongst other factors) influence our food preferences. The responsibility simply cannot be put on the consumer alone; the responsibility also lands firmly on the shoulders of our stores too.


    *UPDATE 13/03/15

    Posted simultaneously, through the power of the internet, here and on Mel's personal blog The Grub Hub.

    Yesterday I received a reply from WHSmith (pictured right), so I felt it only fair to share this and my response to it, as I have for Marks and Spencer, Asda, Sainsbury’s, Morrisons and Iceland Foods.

    My reply was addressed to WHSmith Group Communications Director Mr Mark Sabin:

    Thank you for your letter in response to my request to stop the display and promotion of confectionery at WHSmith till points. I have read with interest your 2014 corporate responsibility report and would now like to raise some issues and questions concerning this report and some of WHSmith’s responsible retailing policies:

    1. In your letter you explained that: “WHSmith are a very small player in the UK confectionery market”. I strongly believe this is not valid justification to ‘opt out’ and pass on your responsibility to the major supermarkets. As a seller of confectionery, sweets and soft drinks, no matter how small your contribution to the market, you are obligated to consider the full impact your products may have on consumer health.

    2. Your report states: “you have extended your healthy food range”. Whilst products such as granola pots, smoothies and health food bars may be marketed as and appear ‘healthy’ they often contain high amounts of added sugar. These items are generally no better than sweets or chocolate and mean that we exceed our recommended sugar intake when consumed in excess. Have you consulted a registered nutritionist or dietitian when determining your product range? Do you have a specific threshold using traffic light labels or set a maximum sugar or fat content (that I mentioned in my previous letter) to help identify healthier products? Reviewing portion sizes of the products you provide is certainly a valuable step you have made but simply looking at the total calorie content is not always entirely helpful. As a nation that is in the midst of a health crisis attributed to diet, it is very important to consider the added sugar, saturated fat and salt content too.

    3. You state that: “where your stores are in travel locations and you offer a more extensive range of food, drinks and snacking products, you have been increasing the range of healthy alternatives”. If you are assuming we are more likely to snack whilst travelling, it would be useful to have an evidence base here and if you are stocking more ‘healthy’ items, are you actively promoting them instead of the confectionery? You must also be confident your healthy alternatives meet the appropriate legislation if they are to be labelled as such. Please can I point you towards this rather large faux pas in one of your stores:


    4. You state that: “your staff are trained to never offer promotions repeatedly to regular customers”. Are you assuming your customers are more likely to be regular if they purchase from stores in travel locations i.e. commuters making repeated journeys? How would WHSmith staff know if a customer is regular or not? Surely staff rotations and altering customer habits would make this impossible to determine with confidence and is a large assumption to make?

    5. You explain that: “when chocolate or confectionery is included as part of a promotion, it is often designed for sharing or as a gift”. This clearly passes on the responsibility to your customer, rather than accepting it yourselves. Again, how can you possibly assume that the confectionery you sell will be shared or gifted?

    6. You explain that WHSmith staff are: “trained on how to offer promotions so that staff never offer confectionery products to parents with children and never offer promotions repeatedly to anyone who has made it known they do not wish to be advised about such promotions”. How can your staff make a judgement that an adult has or does not have children? Children are not the only vulnerable party here either and unless your staff manage your till points throughout every working day, how can they determine if a customer has already been previously asked? You are also putting the onus on the customer to state if and why they don’t want your product. This could potentially be awkward for the customer in making unnecessary justifications.

    Overall I am concerned about the assumptions made about WHSmith customers and from the explanations you have provided, I am not convinced your methods and criteria for selling products is sufficiently robust. I would be very happy however to discuss the nutritional contents and values of the products you offer and help establish a range that is clearly healthy and varied for your customers. I look forward to hearing from you again.
    Yours sincerely,

    Mel Wakeman

    Did you enjoy reading this post? If so, please vote for Fuse in the UK Blog Awards 2016 by clicking here