Showing posts with label trauma. Show all posts
Showing posts with label trauma. Show all posts

Friday, 13 December 2024

When stigma came to town: why a quick fix can never work with a life-long problem

Posted by Ian Treasure, Programme Manager, Changing Futures Lancashire and Cassey Muir, Research Associate, Newcastle University

“When you point a finger, three point back,” a member of our Lived Experience panel said while discussing stigma. Stigma is often invisible, yet it shapes how people perceive themselves and are perceived by others. This saying reminds us that before we judge others, we should first reflect on our own behaviours, actions, and beliefs.

 

The Changing Futures Lancashire Programme and taking a trauma-informed approach

The Changing Futures Lancashire (CFL) programme was one of 15 areas in England chosen to receive funding to test and learn approaches to supporting adults experiencing multiple disadvantage. Anyone experiencing three of the following five conditions were able to access our services:
  • substance misuse
  • homelessness
  • criminal justice involvement
  • poor mental health
  • domestic violence
CFL was a follow on from Fulfilling Lives which also supported this cohort. CFL was different as it was funded through local authorities in an attempt to gain more traction for system-wide change needed to support a seldom heard group. The funders were Ministry for Housing Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) and The National Lottery Community Fund.

Nationally, we focused on measuring improvements for the people we support, how well services work together, and how decisions are made at a higher level. The aim was to create significant changes in the system so that people with complex needs can access the support they need more easily. We adopted a trauma informed approach in the way we offer and provide support. For example, we understand that individuals who may appear aggressive could actually be scared, confused, or reliving past trauma. This non-judgmental approach not only shapes how our providers assist individuals with complex needs but also affects how the adults we support view themselves.

The majority of beneficiaries (90%+) in the Changing Futures programme face poly-substance use (using more than one substance at a time) as the main condition that developed into multiple disadvantage. Many have shared how chronic drug use often leads to involvement with the criminal justice system, poor mental health, and eventually homelessness. Alongside these challenges, many individuals have experienced parental abuse or neglect. Their negative school experiences, often tied to undiagnosed learning disabilities or other barriers, have also shaped their struggles. Over time, our beneficiaries have developed coping strategies to survive—tools they rely on to navigate a world that often feels unsupportive.

Shining a light on stigma

The CFL Programme has made significant strides in supporting individuals facing multiple disadvantage. However, as we delved deeper into the challenges faced by our beneficiaries, we uncovered an invisible yet pervasive barrier: stigma. This insight shifted our focus and prompted us to ask: 
how can we tackle the stigma that often prevents people from seeking the help they need?
People with lived experience helped shape the CFL model, ensuring that it addresses the needs of those who understand these challenges best. During conversations with our beneficiaries, we found that many initially hesitated to seek help because of the trauma and judgment they felt during comprehensive assessments. We responded by removing this entry barrier, focusing instead on the sharing of information between services followed by a more conversational approach that helps build trust without the fear of interrogation. This small change proved to be a key turning point for many individuals, making them feel more comfortable returning for support.

 
 
Across Lancashire we also have started to shed light on the issue of stigma. We created the powerful and thought-provoking film above featuring people with lived experience and other professionals sharing their stories, which has been viewed thousands of times. One case study highlighted a single mum afraid to visit the pharmacy near her child’s school for fear of being seen picking up methadone by another parent, and the stigma she faces as a result. Another featured a man who is street homeless, sleeping in a public toilet, only to be kicked out by the cleaner in font of commuters. These are painful reminders of some people’s situations and how different they feel from everyone else. It became clear that it wasn’t enough for us to only think about how we tackle stigma across our services, we also had to ask ourselves: what else can be done to prevent stigma and to reduce its impact on individuals?

The CFL board agreed that we should do some credible research into the topic. We sent out an enquiry of interest form and Fuse researchers responded.

Reducing stigma: research findings and key recommendations

The project between the CFL programme and Fuse was to conduct a review of the research into what can be done to reduce stigma for adults who experience multiple disadvantage.

At the heart of our work are the people with lived experience who have been instrumental in shaping our approach. Their first-hand insights have been invaluable not only in designing effective services but also in guiding our research on stigma. Many panel members shared how they overcame their own stigma through achievements like gaining employment, while others still face the stigma of past criminal convictions – something that remains a barrier to moving forward. Their voices are central to the research and the recommendations we’ve developed.

We brought together 51 review papers and found that most focused on reducing mental health stigma. Fewer studies addressed stigma related to drug and alcohol use. There was limited research on stigma linked to domestic violence, homelessness, criminal justice involvement, and poverty. Our panel felt that the findings would be relevant across various forms of disadvantage, reflecting that poor mental health or alcohol and drug use often serve as the primary ways people come into contact with services.

The research we reviewed found that stigma reduction approaches typically focused on:
  • individuals experiencing disadvantage and stigma
  • practitioners who provide support
  • the public
There was little research on system-level changes, such as policy changes, that could address stigma more broadly.

We found that social support, particularly through peer-led or group-based approaches, was highly effective in reducing self-stigma among people facing multiple disadvantage. Peer connections helped individuals build stronger and more positive identities and gain confidence, breaking down feelings of isolation.

Additionally, we discovered that combining educational strategies with contact-based training was a powerful way to reduce stigma amongst practitioners and the public. Educational efforts - such as presentations or information addressing misconceptions about disadvantages - were most effective when paired with opportunities for practitioners and the public to meet and learn from people with lived experience. This combination allowed for a deeper understanding of the challenges faced by those with multiple disadvantages and proved more effective than using either method alone.

We engaged with our Lived Experience panel to discuss and explore recommendations. They came up with eight key recommendations to advance this work into practice:
  1. Facilitate peer connections: Provide opportunities for individuals experiencing disadvantage to connect with others who share similar lived experiences. This can help reduce isolation, foster mutual support, and reduce feelings of shame and embarrassment.
  2. Promote peer leadership and advocacy: Encourage individuals with lived experience to take on leadership roles or act as advocates within services. This could help challenge stigma and provide role models for others facing similar challenges.
  3. Incorporate lived experience in service design and delivery: Actively involve individuals with lived experience in the design, development, and delivery of services to ensure they are relevant, responsive, and inclusive.
  4. Embed trauma and stigma informed practices throughout the organisation: Apply both a trauma and stigma informed approach across all levels of the workplace. Training should not only be limited to frontline staff but also extend to managers, supervisors, and directors to ensure everyone is stigma-aware.
  5. Ensure long-term commitment to anti-stigma efforts: Integrate anti-stigma interventions into ongoing practice, ensuring they are not one-off sessions. Offer regular refresher courses to reinforce learning and maintain long-term impact.
  6. Foster collaboration across services: Promote collaboration between all services to ensure they adopt stigma-aware practices. This includes working together across sectors, such as housing, mental health, and other support services, to create a cohesive approach to addressing stigma.
  7. Engage the community: Work on community outreach to raise awareness about stigma and its effects, helping to foster a more inclusive and empathetic environment in the wider community.
  8. Implement system-wide change: Advocate for policy changes that address the root causes of stigma, such as social inequalities, and promote fair access to services for all individuals, regardless of their background or circumstances. System-level changes are crucial because stigma isn’t just about individual attitudes; it’s embedded in our systems, policies, and institutions.
We need your help

The insights from the Changing Futures programme and our research are clear: tackling stigma requires a holistic, multi-level approach. By prioritising peer support, lived experience, and trauma-informed practices, we can make real, lasting change. Now, we need your help. Join us in challenging stigma, watch and share our videos, and support this movement. Together, we can create a more inclusive, empathetic society where everyone has the chance to thrive.


Take the next step (useful resources):

Friday, 19 July 2024

From crisis to collaboration: Transforming support for people experiencing homelessness in North East England

Posted by Steven Thirkle, Research Associate, Newcastle University

People experiencing homelessness often have multiple and complex health and social care needs that require support from many services. However, accessing and coordinating this support can be difficult when services are disconnected geographically or relationally. Often the person who is experiencing these challenges is the one who has to reach out for help, and this can be extremely hard for someone also managing day-to-day homelessness.

During our workshop, More Than Minutes visually captured our discussions, providing a dynamic summary. These visuals encapsulate key insights and recommendations, offering an engaging snapshot of our collective journey towards transforming support for people experiencing homelessness.





















Over the past two years, our team has been working with services that provide support to people experiencing homelessness in rural and coastal areas of North East England. Our goal has been to explore innovative ways to improve access to care and support for these vulnerable people. Here, we share our research findings, shed light on the challenges faced by people experiencing homelessness and present our co-produced recommendations for creating a more effective and holistic (whole person) support system.

What does hospital data tell us?

To understand why people experiencing homelessness in the North East often turn to emergency care services in rural and coastal areas rather than seeking alternative forms of support, we examined hospital data on people attending emergency care services who had no recorded address. We discovered that there are many contributing factors, including struggles with alcohol and drugs, mental health issues, and challenging social situations. These challenges often occur at the same time, exacerbating their complexity and approaches to treatment.

What is stopping homeless people accessing services?

While this numerical data provided valuable insights, it did not uncover the underlying reasons behind the lack of engagement with other support services. To gain deeper insights, we interviewed people experiencing homelessness as well as those providing support in rural and coastal areas. The interviews aimed to explore experiences with emergency care services, overall health, social lives, and past traumas. They revealed significant barriers to accessing services, such as limited resources, transportation challenges inherent to rural areas, and the isolation often felt in coastal communities. Additionally, rigid service criteria and thresholds prevented people from receiving the support they urgently needed, further compounded by the sparse availability of services in these regions.

What is the current picture?

A comprehensive and integrated approach tailored to the rural and coastal context was needed to provide effective support to people experiencing homelessness in these areas, so we mapped out existing services and their collaborative relationships in the areas. Our findings showed a fragmented system, with many services operating independently and lacking essential connections to the core network of services necessary for addressing the unique challenges faced by people in rural and coastal areas.

How do we address the gaps?

In response to these gaps, we organised a workshop at the Community Hub in Cramlington, Northumberland, bringing together over 70 people including professionals from health, housing, social services, local authorities, law enforcement, emergency response, and third-sector organisations, as well as people with lived experience of homelessness and mental health issues in these regions. Together we developed recommendations for a more effective and collaborative approach to supporting people experiencing homelessness in rural and coastal areas. Seven key areas for recommendations were identified:
  1. Long-term funding and resources: Campaign for sustained funding and increased resources to support comprehensive and ongoing assistance for homeless people.
  2. Coordination, connectivity, and communication: Establish robust ways to coordinate, foster better connectivity between services, and improve communication channels to ensure a seamless and integrated support system.
  3. Accessible services - pathways to support: Develop clear and accessible pathways for homeless people to access a wide range of support services, including health, housing, social services, and mental health resources.
  4. Building trust and co-developing services with lived experience: Foster trust and inclusivity by actively involving peoples with lived experience of homelessness in the design, development, and evaluation of support services.
  5. Trauma-informed practice: Implement trauma-informed approaches across all support services, recognising and addressing the underlying trauma experienced by homeless people.
  6. Improved data sharing: Establish efficient data-sharing agreements for support services to ensure comprehensive and up-to-date information, enabling better coordination and informed decision-making.
  7. Staff retention and wellbeing: Prioritise the wellbeing of support staff by providing resources, training, and support to prevent burnout and turnover, fostering continuity of care.

We have developed a handy two-page Fuse research brief which pulls out the key findings and recommendations for practice and policy co-developed with people with lived experience. 

Friday, 22 March 2024

"We need happy memories"

How people who have experienced homelessness are redesigning support

Professor Monique Lhussier & Dr Christina Cooper from Northumbria University, and an Experts by Experience panel

Fuse researchers at Northumbria University were recently awarded £1.4m for a project looking to understand connections between trauma, health and homelessness in the North East. Here the research leads share how they have previously worked to embed community voices to improve health and reduce disparities for people with experience of homelessness.

The link between trauma and homelessness has been well documented, with recent evidence showing that 94% of people experiencing homelessness have experienced trauma. In the majority of cases the trauma was complex and reoccurring, with 65% having experienced four or more traumatic experiences.



In 2023 we received funding from the Arts and Humanities Research Council to develop a network to better support people who had experienced homelessness. We were fortunate to work with eight Experts by Experience (EbEs), or Experts by ‘Disaster’ as Barnie (one of our EbEs) suggested; people who had experienced homelessness, and the complex multiple needs and exclusions that frequently co-occur. The nine months project aimed to develop integrated ways of working, embedding community voices into the system to improve health and reduce disparities for People with Experience of Homelessness (PEH).

Discussions, which were led by EbE throughout the project, reiterated that trauma was common and often started in childhood, and followed by further re-traumatising events. Karl commented that while he remembered in vivid detail what had happened to him as a child, he often could not recall what he had been doing last week, highlighting the lasting impacts of trauma. Further discussions highlighted negative impacts throughout life, from relationships, education, employment to mental illness, suicide and addiction.

We reflected as a group that PEH are often viewed through a lens that considers only their immediate needs; shelter, clothing, food, and healthcare. Drawing on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs we considered that only the bottom two tiers are the most consistently met, but belonging and esteem much less so. The Experts by Experience felt that people need to be given a chance to grow in more holistic ways across all tiers of the hierarchy in order to become healthier and happier.

Tonkin’s model of grief proposes a way to see a happy and meaningful future focusing on growth around the grief. From these discussions, we collaboratively designed the graph below, which superimposes Maslow’s hierarchy of needs with and adapted version of Tonkin’s, in a model to inform ongoing and future work.

We have begun to explore this model through three core project strands:
  1. an innovation fund for which EbE were responsible;
  2. participation in an accredited Northumbria University module, and
  3. through understanding the impacts of involvement with the project.
The innovation fund pilot involved the development and implementation of five creative projects providing sustainable and varied opportunities for self-care, learning, and physical activity for People with Experience of Homelessness. One of those, the Hope Project, gave opportunities for 189 PEH to take part in new creative, social, or physical activities. Steven designed the Hope Project on the premise that ‘people need happy memories’, which those who have experienced trauma do not always have, to draw on when the going gets tough. Barnie explained that often people lose the motivation and ability to cook for themselves when they have lived on the streets. He designed cookery classes with a train the trainer model, meaning that many people have since benefitted from eating healthier food that they had cooked themselves. Lee set up a bike repair workshop so people can take part in physical activity and be more self-sufficient.


Being given the opportunity to manage a budget, help others and having the status of university student (“I have been called many things; it was nice being called a student!”), stood out as having had a positive impact for many of the Experts by Experience. Lee and Porl said that opportunities to shape the project and develop their skills as researchers led to them feeling trusted and valued as equal members of the project team. Further to this, involvement in the project gave a sense of purpose and belonging, and increased confidence for many EbE.

This supported the notion that it is possible to grow around trauma when we attend to people’s experiences, hopes, talents, potentials and ambitions, as well as their basic needs. It also challenged us, as researchers, to think of research not solely as a detached enterprise, but as an inherent part of a system that can support people to grow and have more positive and valuing experiences.

*This blog has been written in memory of Ben


References:
Image:
  1. Photo by Matt Collamer on Unsplash